Beta
Today
Regulatory & Legal 8 Nov 2026

EU Parliament and Council propose PPWR relief for small cross-border packaging producers

The European Parliament backed a temporary suspension of the PPWR local-representative requirement for EU-based micro and small businesses in October, while the Council proposed relief for producers placing less than one tonne of packaging a year in each destination member state. No suspension has yet become law, and the Commission has asked member states not to impose sanctions over the requirement while talks continue. Estonian online retailer Luregod says representation and recycling fees in each market create a costly barrier for small cross-border sellers.

Why this mattersAn enacted carve-out would spare small cross-border sellers the cost of a representative in each destination market, a fixed burden critics say favours large producers.

  • The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation generally started applying in August 2026.
  • In October 2026 the European Parliament backed a temporary suspension of the representative requirement for EU-based micro and small businesses.
  • The Council separately proposed relief for producers placing under one tonne of packaging per year in each destination member state.
  • The European Commission has asked member states to apply the representative requirement pragmatically and to refrain from sanctions over it while talks continue.
  • EFTTA, the European Fishing Tackle Trade Association, says minimum recycled-content requirements for plastic packaging begin to apply from 2030 and tighten towards 2040.
  • Estonian online retailer Luregod says it can cost thousands of euros to become compliant in each EU market.
European Commission counterparty Luregod European Fishing Tackle Trade Association
Sources Angling International
Relevant to you?

Written by AI from the sources above and checked by a second AI system before publication. No human wrote or edited this story. How it is made.

Updates

  • 2026-11-09 · Edited before publication: 'Thousands of small online sellers' is not in the source. The proposed relief covers the authorised representative requirement, not EPR registration as a whole.
  • 2026-11-09 · Edited before publication: The claim that 'retailers and trade bodies' call the rules a costly barrier overstated the source. Only Luregod says that; EFTTA describes the regulation as a fundamental shift. Summary rewritten to attribute the claim correctly and to add the Commission's request not to apply sanctions.