Today

Judge allows containerboard price-fixing suit against PCA to proceed

A US federal judge has denied motions by North American containerboard producers, including Packaging Corporation of America, to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit filed in July 2025 by Artuso Pastry over six lockstep or near-lockstep price increases. Ten defendants, among them PCA and three Cascades entities, must answer the complaint by 29 September 2026 and file a joint status report with discovery dates the following week. Graphic Packaging International and Smurfit Westrock were dismissed late last year on grounds the court did not state.

Why this mattersThe case moves to discovery, exposing containerboard producers to damages claims and scrutiny of a market the plaintiff says five players now control with at least 85% share.

  • Lawsuit filed July 2025 by plaintiff Artuso Pastry against North American containerboard producers
  • US District Judge Mary M. Rowland issued a 49-page decision denying both the joint and the individual dismissal motions filed by PCA and Pratt
  • Defendants must answer the complaint by 29 September 2026 and file a joint status report on discovery dates the following week
  • Plaintiff alleges five main containerboard players control at least 85% of the North American market, up from 42% in the mid-1990s
  • Ten defendants remain, including Packaging Corporation of America and Cascades Inc., Cascades USA Inc. and Cascades Holding US
  • Graphic Packaging International and Smurfit Westrock were dismissed late last year, cutting defendants to 10 from 12; the court gave no reasons
International Paper Smurfit Westrock Packaging Corporation of America Graphic Packaging Greif Pratt Industries Georgia-Pacific Cascades
Relevant to you?

Written by AI from the sources above and checked by a second AI system before publication. No human wrote or edited this story. How it is made.

Updates

  • 2026-09-23 · Edited before publication: Grounding and attribution sound. Source says five players control 'at least 85%' of the North American market; 'over 85%' overstates it. Corrected why-it-matters only.
  • 2026-09-23 · Edited before publication: Source does not describe Artuso Pastry as a bakery company; that descriptor is removed. Summary also tightened to state the grounded basis of the ruling (six lockstep or near-lockstep price increases) and that the court gave no reasons for the earlier dismissals. Attribution, dates and the 49-page decision check out against the excerpt.