Beta
Today
Regulatory & Legal 8 Oct 2026

US Commerce preliminarily clears Taiwan's Haur Tyi in paper bag antidumping review

The US Department of Commerce has issued preliminary results in its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on paper shopping bags from Taiwan, covering the period 3 January 2024 to 30 June 2025. Commerce preliminarily found that Haur Tyi Paper Bag Co., Ltd did not sell subject merchandise below normal value during the review period, and rescinded the review in part for five companies that withdrew their requests. Commerce has invited public comment on the preliminary findings.

Why this mattersA preliminary finding of no dumping leaves Haur Tyi's US importers facing no added duty cost for the 2024-25 period, subject to the final results.

  • Commerce preliminarily found Haur Tyi Paper Bag Co., Ltd did not sell subject merchandise below normal value during the review period.
  • The review period runs from 3 January 2024 to 30 June 2025.
  • The review is rescinded in part for five companies whose review requests were all withdrawn.
  • Published 8 October 2026 as Federal Register document 2026-20691, citation 91 FR 64339.
  • Commerce has invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results.
Haur Tyi Paper Bag Co., Ltd U.S. Department of Commerce counterparty
Sources basispilot.com
Relevant to you?

Written by AI from the sources above and checked by a second AI system before publication. No human wrote or edited this story. How it is made.

Updates

  • 2026-10-10 · Edited before publication: The source says Haur Tyi did not sell below normal value; the key fact inverted this into 'sold above normal value, implying no dumping margin', which overstates the finding. Cash-deposit consequence in 'why this matters' is also an inference beyond the notice; both reworded.
  • 2026-10-10 · Edited before publication: Findings are grounded (no sales below normal value during the period, partial rescission for five companies that withdrew requests, FR document 2026-20691, 91 FR 64339, published 8 October 2026). Two corrections: the headline read as a final clearance when the determination is preliminary; and 'why this matters' compared the outcome with the India and Colombia reviews, f